Base Phi Representations:
Base Phi Minimum Binary, Base Phi Maximum Binary
Casey Mongoven
August 13, 2006
the sequences: There exists a binary non-standard positional number system which uses
the golden ratio as a base. In this system, powers of the golden ratio are used
instead of the powers of ten used in the decimal system. Despite the base being
irrational, every integer has a unique finite representation.
The golden ratio values are
symbolized by Phi = 1.618033989
, and phi =
.618033989
. The following diagram shows the values of the powers of Phi, and
illustrates an interesting relation to the Fibonacci sequence:
|
Phi5 |
8 + 5phi |
11.0901699
|
|
Phi4 |
5 + 3phi |
6.85410197
|
|
Phi3 |
3 + 2phi |
4.23606798
|
|
Phi2 |
2 + 1phi |
2.61803399
|
|
Phi1 |
1 + 1phi |
1.61803399
|
|
Phi0 |
1 + 0phi |
1.00000000
|
|
Phi-1 |
0 + 1phi |
0.61803399
|
|
Phi-2 |
1 - 1phi |
0.38196601
|
|
Phi-3 |
-1 + 2phi |
0.23606798
|
|
Phi-4 |
2 - 3phi |
0.14589803
|
|
Phi-5 |
-3 + 5phi |
0.09016994
|
This relation to the
Fibonacci sequence can be captured in the equation:
Phin = Fibn+1 + Fibn*phi
Here are the
integers 1 through 11 in base Phi:
|
decimal |
powers of Phi |
base Phi |
|
1 |
Phi0 |
1 |
|
2 |
Phi1+Phi-2 |
10.01 |
|
3 |
Phi2+Phi-2 |
100.01 |
|
4 |
Phi2+Phi0+Phi-2 |
101.01 |
|
5 |
Phi3+Phi-1+Phi-4 |
1000.1001 |
|
6 |
Phi3+Phi1+Phi-4 |
1010.0001 |
|
7 |
Phi4+Phi-4 |
10000.0001 |
|
8 |
Phi4+Phi0+Phi-4 |
10001.0001 |
|
9 |
Phi4+Phi1+Phi-2+Phi-4 |
10010.0101 |
|
10 |
Phi4+Phi2+Phi-2+Phi-4 |
10100.0101 |
|
11 |
Phi4+Phi2+Phi0+Phi-2+Phi-4 |
10101.0101 |
A radix point . is used
to separate the powers of Phi into those greater than or equal to 1 and those
less than 1.
As a rule, the base Phi
representations of integers shown above never contain the digit sequence 11
(or 1.1). Put in other words, they never contain any consecutive powers of Phi
(Phi4 and Phi3, for example). This system of representing
integers and the piece based on it I will call Base Phi Minimum Binary.1
Because in this system 100
is equal to 011 (this follows from Phin = Phin-1 + Phin-2), it is possible to use a replacing-algorithm to eliminate every
occurrence of the digit sequence 00 so that every integer also has an
alternate unique finite representation which contains no instance of 00. This
system of representations and the piece based on it I will call Base Phi Maximum Binary.
Both sequences are shown
below:
Minimum
Maximum
0 0. 0.
1 1. 1.
2 10.01 1.11
3 100.01 11.01
4 101.01 101.01
5 1000.1001 101.1111
6 1010.0001 111.0111
7 10000.0001 1010.1101
8 10001.0001 1011.1101
9 10010.0101 1101.1101
10 10100.0101 1111.0101
11 10101.0101 10101.0101
12 100000.101001 10101.111111
13 100010.001001
10111.011111
14 100100.001001
11010.110111
15 100101.001001
11011.110111
16 101000.100001
11101.110111
17 101010.000001
11111.010111
18 1000000.000001 101010.101101
19 1000001.000001 101011.101101
20 1000010.010001 101101.101101
21 1000100.010001 101110.111101
22 1000101.010001 101111.111101
23 1001000.100101 110101.111101
24 1001010.000101 110111.011101
25 1010000.000101 111010.110101
26 1010001.000101 111011.110101
27 1010010.010101 111101.110101
28 1010100.010101 111111.010101
29 1010101.010101 1010101.010101
More terms (as many as 24,476)
and other files for performing this work can be found at the following web
addresses:2
http://caseymongoven.com/catalogue/B416.html
and http://caseymongoven.com/catalogue/B417.html
the pieces: This score is for two works (catalogue B416 and B417), and these pieces
can be performed separately or on the same concert. The order of performance is
not important. Freedom is given to the performers to determine compositional
aspects of the works with certain restrictions to be explained.
In this work, each player
is assigned a power of Phi. Each performer plays their note - the same note - every
time their assigned power of Phi occurs in the integer being expressed. The
following example of Base Phi Minimum
Binary in traditional notation should help make this clear:
The above example is a
short performance (only 11 integers) for 8 players.
There are 3 versions of
this work: one for percussion instruments of indefinite pitch, one for
percussion instruments of definite pitch, and one for pitched instruments (in
which some percussion instruments are allowed as well). Each player plays the
same type of instrument in every case. The three versions are explained separately
below. First, the elements common in all versions will be explained.
number of integers played: Each member of the sequence is given equal duration.
The duration of each member is up to the performers to decide, but should be at
least 70 beats per minute (.857 seconds or faster). The players are to start
with the representation for 1 and play through in increasing order (i.e. in
decimal notation 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,
). A Lucas number of
integers are to be played:
2,1,3,4,7,11,18,29,47,76,123,199,322,521,843,1364,2207,3571,
One can imagine that very
long performances are possible. If both works are played, the same number of
integers should be played in both.
number of players: The number of integers to be played determines the number of players
required. If for example, 11 integers are to be played in the minimum
representation, this will require 8 players because 10101.0101 has 9 digits and
the second to last digit is never used in the minimum representation (this can
be seen in the example in traditional notation above; Phi-3 has only
rests). Note, however, that for maximum representations a player is needed to
represent every digit.
spacing on stage: In performance, regardless of the number of players needed, there should
be a person standing in for the power of Phi not used in the minimum
representations - with instrument if possible.
There are 3 options for
spacing in this work. In each spacing, the players
line up in a straight line from stage left to stage right. The
bigger the space where playing and the more reverberation, the larger the space
between the performers should be. Space is always measured from the
center of the body. The positions should be marked on stage beforehand as in
one of the following options:
1. Even spacing is used.
There should be at least 1.4 meters, performer to performer. For example:
Φ4----Φ3----Φ2----Φ1----Φ0----Φ-1----Φ-2----Φ-3----Φ-4
2. Even spacing with a
radix point is used. There should be at least 1.4 meters between each performer
and the space representing the radix point should be at least 2 times the
distance between each performer and can be much greater. It is optional to use
an object to represent the radix point; if used, this should be placed directly
in between performers Φ0 and Φ-1.
For example:
Φ4----Φ3----Φ2----Φ1----Φ0----.----Φ-1----Φ-2----Φ-3----Φ-4
3. Spacing based on the
golden ratio is used. In this spacing, the distance between the players increases from right to left based on the golden
ratio. The space between the two 2 right-most players cannot be less than 75 centimeters. If x
represents the space between the players at the right-most end, then the
distance for between the players is figured as such:
Phi3*x Phi2*x
Phi*x x
Φ2--------------------Φ1------------Φ0-------Φ-1----Φ-2
In the 3rd spacing
option, the smaller space must be between the smaller powers of Phi as shown. This
option requires more space to perform than the others.
Any of these spacings given
as examples may be inverted from left to right; the lowest value can be on the
left or right side.
synchronization: Some
electronic means of synchronization must be used in performance for the sake of
large scale precision. This can be a conductor who is connected to a click
track, a click track for the performers, or a blinking light. If a conductor is
used, he should be placed in a position that does not block the sound field of
the performers.
articulation, dynamic, manner of playing: The group should agree on a dynamic level which will
stay the same for the duration of the work. Each player plays their note
exactly the same each time: exactly as loud and in the exact same manner as the
other players. The posture of the musicians should be as uniform as possible. The
attack should be crisp. For instruments with decay times longer than the
duration of one member of the sequence, the note should be dampened each time
it is played. Each note should last an absolute maximum of 1 member of the
sequence (i.e. in the example above in traditional notation, at maximum as long
as a quarter note).
rehearsal, performance suggestions: After the performers have agreed on how to perform the
work, preparations must be made by each player. Each player should practice
their part without the group beforehand. Although it is up to the performers, I
would recommend not using standard notation in performing this work. In faster
versions it might be necessary for some performers to write out their part in
some standard notation. But it is best to perform the work with a list of
numbers in front of oneself, with the part to be performed in bold print:
1 1. 1.
2 10.01 1.11
3 100.01 11.01
4 101.01 101.01
5 1000.1001 101.1111
6 1010.0001 111.0111
7 10000.0001 1010.1101
8 10001.0001 1011.1101
9 10010.0101 1101.1101
10 10100.0101 1111.0101
11 10101.0101 10101.0101
12 100000.101001 10101.111111
13 100010.001001 10111.011111
14 100100.001001 11010.110111
15 100101.001001 11011.110111
16 101000.100001 11101.110111
17 101010.000001 11111.010111
18 1000000.000001 101010.101101
The 0s are, of course
rests, and 1s attacks. Such notation for this work is available at the web
addresses given above with up to 24,476 members.3
The difficult task of
performing long versions of this work can be made easier by recognizing the
regularity and patterns in the digits. Numbers indicating the length of the
runs of 1s and 0s might be hand-written into the margin of the score. The players
at the ends must be prepared to play long runs of notes without losing count. It
can be very helpful to practice this work at slower tempos. Also of great
importance is to check ones counting by listening to the players directly on ones
left or right side, because their parts are most visible in the score.
Players who find the lack
of barlines (and standard notation) in the work
confusing might draw in lines into the score as such:
1 1. 1.
2 10.01 1.11
3 100.01 11.01
4 101.01 101.01 .
5 1000.1001 101.1111
6 1010.0001 111.0111
7 10000.0001 1010.1101
8 10001.0001
1011.1101 .
9 10010.0101 1101.1101
10 10100.0101 1111.0101
11 10101.0101 10101.0101
12 100000.101001
10101.111111 .
13 100010.001001 10111.011111
14 100100.001001 11010.110111
15 100101.001001 11011.110111
16 101000.100001
11101.110111 .
17 101010.000001 11111.010111
18 1000000.000001 101010.101101
The score might also be
turned on its side for a player who finds it confusing to read music
vertically.
The conductor or director
overseeing the group in rehearsal should keep a printed list of the members of
the sequence as such at hand: